WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An immigration reform bill that would create a guest worker program pushed by President George W. Bush won approval on Monday from a U.S. Senate panel against a backdrop of noisy and emotional protests in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Detroit.
The Senate is struggling to enact compromise legislation to better secure America's borders while offering millions a chance to be in the country legally, setting up a politically bruising battle with the U.S. House of Representatives, where the Republican majority has come out against legal incentives.
The Senate Judiciary Committee passed the measure on a 12-6 vote. It goes to the full Senate later this week, where a heated debate is expected over the guest worker program, which critics call an amnesty for some illegal immigrants.
The committee's action came as President George W. Bush warned on Monday against fearmongering on the divisive issue.
"No one should play on people's fears or try to pit neighbors against each other," Bush said. "No one should pretend that immigrants are a threat to American identity, because immigrants have shaped America's identity."
Provisions of the measure that would allow some of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants a chance to legalize their status and earn citizenship will set the stage for a bruising election-year battle with the House, where many of the Republican majority oppose incentives for illegal immigrants.
But Senate backers said it is not an amnesty.
"A path to earned citizenship is what this bill is about," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who joined Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Edward Kennedy in offering the measure. He said it was "an eleven-year journey" to earn citizenship and candidates would have to pay a fine, undergo criminal background checks, learn English and pay their taxes.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, called it a "a measured bill."
With his job approval rating at a low ebb, Bush is facing a new test of his political strength during a mid-term election year, weeks after Republicans deserted him on a controversial deal to allow an Arab company to manage six U.S. ports.
TAKING IT TO THE STREETS
In Los Angeles on Monday, hundreds of mostly Latino students blocked two major downtown freeways, chanting in Spanish and waving flags from Mexico and El Salvador. Traffic was snarled until police could move the students off the road but no accidents, injuries or arrests were reported.
In Boston, more than 2000 people gathered in the city's common, waving Latin American, Caribbean and Irish flags while marching downtown and calling for urgent immigration reform.
"I'm here to support the Hispanic community," said Amilcar Gonzalez, a 23-year-old illegal janitor from Guatemala. "We are not terrorists, we just want to work."
The House in December passed a tough border security and enforcement bill that called for construction of a fence along the U.S. border with Mexico and would require employers to check the status of their workers. It would make living in the country without proper documents a felony and does not include Bush's guest worker program.
That bill has sparked hundreds of thousands of mostly Hispanic demonstrators to protest. Thousands turned out on Monday in San Francisco and Los Angeles and some 4,000 took to the streets in Detroit, following a gathering of more than 200,000 in Los Angeles on Saturday.
More than a dozen immigrants and their advocates have been camped out on a week-long hunger strike at San Francisco's federal building. "Symbolically they are putting their life on the line because immigrants do every day," Robert Palmer of the Bay Area Immigrant Rights Coalition.
The U.S. public is divided between those who favor curbing illegal immigration with tighter border security and tougher enforcement and those who say it is essential to bring some of the estimated 12 million illegal workers out of the shadows with a comprehensive overhaul.
Immigrant groups, labor unions and some business groups are pushing for broad reform, including a guest worker program.
Outside the Capitol building on Monday, an estimated 1,500 protesters joined more than 100 clergy members.
In Oakland, Calif., Fernando Suarez del Solar, who says he immigrated legally in 1997, said the United States was happy to accept his son -- killed in Iraq in 2003 -- into the armed forces even though he had a residency permit, not citizenship.
(Additional reporting by Patricia Wilson in Washington, Adam Tanner in San Francisco, Bernie Woodall in Los Angeles, Jason Szep in Boston)
My question is where are the africans ? I see Europeans, Lationos, and Carabeans mentioned....Where are you Africa....
The bill includes a guest worker program but it will also criminalise every single illegal person in the US - it also makes it illegal to help an immigrant. If an illegal immigrant sleeps at your house... you are a criminal - anyone that has siblings , some in status other out would be commiting a criminal act. The bill DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. who ever said that please tkae time ane review the bill in its entirety... It also means that in the next 2 yrs anyone who is trying to swithc jobs will have to be screened thru the INS. All employer will have a hotline # to call in to see if your ilegal. They will cheak US cicitzens too so forget abuot a loophole where u can pass as an American and wont be chekced. Also, People who are currenlty employed will be forced to undergoe a similar check. When u turn peopl e in to criminal it automatically means anything u do will bear a bigger punishment. Under the new bill a green card holder can be deporte for drinking and driving. No one is safe.
You obviously don't live in the West. If you did you'll probably be more aware of immigration and all the hyprocrisy that surrounds it.
It pains those who disowns their motherlands.If I were there I would make sure I qualify to their needs.For your information,Ive my direct relatives living there legally.What they are doing is just to screen those fanatics in fear of next bombers.Just for mu info...are you living as an expertriate,student or illegal immigrant.no offence intended.
__________________
If Iam not for myself,who will be for me?And if Iam only for myself,what am I?
POPE WROTE: It pains those who disowns their motherlands.If I were there I would make sure I qualify to their needs.For your information,Ive my direct relatives living there legally.What they are doing is just to screen those fanatics in fear of next bombers.Just for mu info...are you living as an expertriate,student or illegal immigrant.no offence intended.
Pope, From your statement I can see that you really dont live here. Your family is legal in the US great. but for every one legal family there is about 5 have been turned away from trying to become legal in the liegit way. Illegal immirgation is not just about the Mexicans, its about all imimgrants in the US, and at the end of the day when they are trying to purge out the Mexicans we will be purged too. If it was that easy to get a green card in the US , dont u thing a normal person would have tried to do so ? No one chooses to be illegal , unless they are face with a system that doesnt want to legalise them. Do you reliase that immigration laws in the US are desinged to keep people out and not in? For African it is worse. An african in order to immigrate here legally needs to have a college degree, Europeans high school. Th law here is by no means fair, or equal to all groups. And under the law, if ur illegal , whether ur in w white collar job or a blue collar one, u can still get got. And to prove my point I would like to challenge you to try and come to the states, and apply from a green card legally and do everything by the book - it aint gonna happen. There are abuot 12- 17 Million illegals in the US, and the US issues something like 20,000 visas per yr, and they ae planing to reduce this number - reducing this number is not going to keep a terrorist out. Most of the terrorist were green card holders or here under student visas. They werent people living here illegally trying to make $2 and hour at a milk farm.
They pitch this whole immigration thing and make it sound like its about border protection and the fanatics - but really , Mexicans - there not fanatics, and niether are africans. The laws they pass pertain to all. The only thing is that at leat inLation American they will have a guest worker program. Europeans will alwyas be white...that leaves us, the black african -
It pains those who disowns their motherlands.If I were there I would make sure I qualify to their needs.For your information,Ive my direct relatives living there legally.What they are doing is just to screen those fanatics in fear of next bombers.Just for mu info...are you living as an expertriate,student or illegal immigrant.no offence intended.
Every country had immigrants. In fact America is made up almost entirely of immigrants who "disowned" their countries. Unfortunately for you since you don't live in the west you are harldy aware or the dynamics of the immigration debates and political point scoring from both sides.
The right-wing American government has spent so much time ratching up the fear of immigrants that they don't know what is real and what is actually made up. Their foreign policy isn't even helping much.
The amount of revenue that these immigrant contribute to the economy is so much that they cannot afford to restrict it. Not with the present deficit.
The amount of revenue that these immigrant contribute to the economy is so much that they cannot afford to restrict it. Not with the present deficit.
Thats where you are wrong,then why are they?Do you think they are mad.If you see a frog in the day,know theres something chasing behind.I said already,I alwaays move as a legal immigrant and you are right we have illegal immigrants in malawi thus why we keep flushing out aand changing our immigration laws.By the way you forgot my question.
__________________
If Iam not for myself,who will be for me?And if Iam only for myself,what am I?
If the question was about my legal status; I'm a citizen of this country. Fortunately for me. But if you did live here you'll see for yourself the hypocrisy and racism that underlines the debate as Blackpanther has shown.
It's obvious you don't and probably never lived in the west. If you had you'll know what the fuss is about and why those thousands of people are demonstrating.
Just in case your wondering, Im legal here too. but I dont forget about the many people that do not hav the opportunity right now, and I will stand by them weather form Mexcio or Malawi. You see,
Pope wrote, "I alwaays move as a legal immigrant "
And this is a good thing, and please consider yourself lucky but remember that they are many , that try to live legally but have stacks against them. Obviously everyone tries to live life legally, but sometimes , if you want to get anywhere in life, people are forced to do what they can and this is how the fitest survive.
If the question was about my legal status; I'm a citizen of this country. Fortunately for me.
Thats being wise,nowonder your positions on most of issues.Thats what people shoud be doing instead of survival of fittest or in the name of economical contribution.Africa needs most of those illegal immigrants and they have to flush them out,out ouuut and back to home.
I have lived in the west and I know what is like and thus why I would rather stay here and try to contribute to my motherland and enjoy the little is there than go through all those ridiculing plans,speeches,targeted bills and racisms.Abre, you may have a good work,home and status but check on others dont you think they would have been better here or in Mexico.LETS BE REALISTIC Panther,and we r saying we have vision for our future Malawi.
The bottom line is that we have to be legal to avoid such embassments.
__________________
If Iam not for myself,who will be for me?And if Iam only for myself,what am I?
That's the most politically ignorant population on the face of the earth you're talking of, they don't know any better.If I were American and I understood the economics of immigration in the US (fat chance!), the passing of that bill would reeeeeeally p*** me of.
If you can, get hold of last week's Time magazine and take a look at the globalisation articles. It has an analysis of China's trading relationship with the US, and the reasonableness of the various reactions and perceptions (in both countrys, Europe and the rest of the world) of globalisation, and China's ever growing competitive clout.
Thre negative effects are there, but the people who have felt them are much more visible than those that have benefited as a result. They are protecting their interests, they have to be seen. Politicians have responded by trying to "out tough" each other. The Immigration bill (or whatever its called) is the product of poliical survival, certainly not rationality. If you look at the bill in light of all the figures, you will see it is is quite unreasonable.
It has an analysis of China's trading relationship with the US, and the reasonableness of the various reactions and perceptions (in both countrys, Europe and the rest of the world) of globalisation, and China's ever growing competitive clout. Thre negative effects are there, but the people who have felt them are much more visible than those that have benefited as a result. They are protecting their interests, they have to be seen. Politicians have responded by trying to "out tough" each other.
A weapon is what you use to fight an enemy, you dont look at it as an object.I once said theres a tod being chased in the day time...........may be do you know the one chasing.America is in turmoil,remember what Chavez(sp) said at one time, in another century we may see a different America and I hope we are preparing for that like China is doing.
__________________
If Iam not for myself,who will be for me?And if Iam only for myself,what am I?
abre les ojos wrote: If the question was about my legal status; I'm a citizen of this country. Fortunately for me. Thats being wise,nowonder your positions on most of issues.Thats what people shoud be doing instead of survival of fittest or in the name of economical contribution.Africa needs most of those illegal immigrants and they have to flush them out,out ouuut and back to home. I have lived in the west and I know what is like and thus why I would rather stay here and try to contribute to my motherland and enjoy the little is there than go through all those ridiculing plans,speeches,targeted bills and racisms.Abre, you may have a good work,home and status but check on others dont you think they would have been better here or in Mexico.LETS BE REALISTIC Panther,and we r saying we have vision for our future Malawi. The bottom line is that we have to be legal to avoid such embassments.
The bottom line is that we have to be legal to avoid such embassments.
people aim at being legal but the system doesnt want to leagalise everyone so they end up being illegal. Why would you be embarrased to be illegal if there is a systme that is unfair to you or gives you embarresemnet... some of the people that marched in the streets cmae and gave thie names and said I am here I am illegal .... I dont see the connection between having vision and being illegal when itss forced on people and not a choice....???? It is also fair to say it is very good for leaders to live outside of theri enviroment because it gives you new ideas to implement and a new perspective on life!
To Abre -no wonder your positions on most of issues.Thats what people shoud be doing instead of survival of fittest or-
I think Abres status should have nothing to do with the viewpoints he has - If someone has valid points and can validate them....fine with me. Anyway, I dont know how else to put it to Pope- but like I said - people try to survive because they are forced in to a situation - most people dont emigrate anywhere with intentions of being illegal....
I would rather stay here and try to contribute to my motherland and enjoy the little is there
for every one person like youthat is doing okay and 'enjoying ' the use of computers and ability to click on there are 50 guys that would have been doing nothing back home. Thats the reality. There is little opportunity in malawi. this doesnt mean that those 50 people are less Malawian or appreciate the country any less..