Boy burnt for stealing fish 09/02/2006 22:31 - (SA) Raphael Tenthani
Blantyre - A Malawi court on Thursday sentenced a couple to 18 months in jail for burning their 10-year-old son on the cheek in what they claimed to be "Sharia" law to punish him for stealing the family supper.
James Saimoni and his wife, Agnes, admitted that they burnt the boy, who was not named because he is a minor, for stealing fish.
But they insisted that they had done nothing wrong because Islamic law allowed them, as Muslims, to discipline their son.
The boy told the court in the southern lakeside town of Mangochi, 200km north of the commercial capital of Blantyre, that he took the fish because his stepmother denied him adequate food.
A village vigilante group arrested the couple and handed them over to police after the December 6 incident.
Mangochi magistrate Derezina Gomiwa told the couple Malawi is a secular state and has no religious laws.
She observed that incidents of burning children were on the rise in the district.
"It is the duty of the courts to impose meaningful sentences that would act as a deterrent to would-be offenders," she said.
The offence of unlawful wounding carries a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment with hard labour in Malawi, but Gomiwa said she passed a lighter sentence because it was a first offence.
More than 80% of Malawi's 12 million people are Christian, although Mangochi is predominantly Muslim.
Sheria law in Malawi? What's wrong with Sheria anyways? Who should decide if we should use it or not. Who says that what we call "secular" law is more humane than sheria??
malawian wrote: Sheria law in Malawi? What's wrong with Sheria anyways? Who should decide if we should use it or not. Who says that what we call "secular" law is more humane than sheria??-- Edited by malawian at 21:14, 2006-03-09
Oh there's a lot of things wrong with Sharia law. Considering that it is based on out-dated, pre human rights, inhumane methods. The story alone should be enough to answer your question.
oh my!!sharia law on your own child,this inhumane practice should we say is a result of poverty,as much as i know that poverty makes people do some appalling stuff but this is way out of order,its so terrifying that your own parent can do this to you.
__________________
all i have is my word,and i dont break it for nobody.
Pope wrote: Is it a moslem belief or was it out of hunger and greed.I wish this couple had no children at all.
None of them. It's called child abuse and it certainly is illegal, hence the sentencing. Malawi is really a secular democracy (sorry to surprise you religious folk).
. None of them. It's called child abuse and it certainly is illegal, hence the sentencing. Malawi is really a secular democracy (sorry to surprise you religious folk).
Islamists have said that the Islamic Sharia is the only rescue operation capable of saving humankind from their confusion, bewilderment, anxiety, turmoil, and evils. They have claimed that it has become an urgent need of humanity, made necessary by the invalidity of the Western and Eastern patterns of government, since these, they say, lack the element of permanence. They have also claimed that, "The Sharia of Islam is the only solution because it is above human inclinations and mortal defect. It is not subject to the criteria of right and wrong, since it is above trial. Above all, it is divine law!
doesnt this make it a religious belief?
__________________
all i have is my word,and i dont break it for nobody.
Who decides what are human "rights" or wrongs? The majority of people tend to condemn the sharia because they believe that "Secular" laws are superior than any other. I don't see why we should condemn it if it works perfectly in some countries.Your definition of human "RIGHTS" might be very different from those who practise Sharia. We can only bring our verdict if we understand them better and realise what human rights or wrongs are for them. What might be legal here can not forcibly be the same for them.
Yes but the idea of human rights are statues based on the notion that every man is equal, everybody is entitled to their opinions as long as they don't infringe on thers and especially that human life is unquantifiable. You see the problem with this in the western context is that people in the west are hypocritical about human rights. A case to point is Iraq. Some people stupidly believe that it is acceptable to kill children and families in order to impose human rights. Human right should include to right to live shouldn't it?
That is the flaw in the concept. I believe that religion is a delusion but can recognise the neccesity of it is some circumstances but if Sharia law requires that you burn your child in the face, any progressive human being should at least see the flaw in it.
If Sharia Law requires that a woman be flogged in public for adultery, then I'm sorry to say it cannot claim the moral, upper hand.
People have often used "divine" claim to justify everything. I can claim God told me to do anything. It probably is a good thing that that doesn't stand up in court.